爾灣聖徒改革宗長老會
  • 主頁 Home
    • 北美改革宗長老會歷史
    • 爾灣聖徒改革宗長老會簡介
  • 我們的信仰 Our Confessions
    • 西敏斯特信仰告白 The Westminster Confession of Faith
    • 西敏斯特大要理問答 The Westminster Larger Catechism
    • 西敏斯特小要理問答 The Westminster Shorter Catechism
    • 多特信條 Canons of Dort
    • 85要理問答補充 Catechism Supplement
    • 孩童教理問答 Catechism For Young Children
  • 主日信息總覽表Sermons
    • 什麼是改革宗長老會
    • 新生命系列-彼得前後書
    • 馬太福音 1-4章
    • 馬太福音 5-7章 登山寶訓
    • 馬太福音13章-天國的奧秘
    • 馬太福音 14-17 章 君王退隱
    • 馬太福音 18 章 天國生命
    • 馬太福音 19-20 天國實際
    • 馬太福音 21-23章 衝突與決裂
    • 馬太福音 24-25 章 橄欖山寶訓
    • 馬太福音 26-28 章 基督的十字架
    • 約翰福音
    • 羅馬書 8 章 生命聖靈律之新生命樣式
    • 以弗所書
    • 創世記
    • 提摩太前書
    • 詩篇 系列
    • 傳道書
    • 箴言書
    • 猶大書 3-4
    • 哈巴谷書
    • 歷代誌
    • 但以理書
    • 帖撒羅尼迦前書
  • 敬拜禮儀 Liturgies
    • 我們的敬拜 Our Worship >
      • 本週-敬拜禮儀 01
      • 本週-敬拜禮儀 02
      • 本週-敬拜禮儀 03
      • 本週-敬拜禮儀 04
      • 本週-敬拜禮儀 05
      • 本週-敬拜禮儀 06
      • 本週-敬拜禮儀 07
      • 本週-敬拜禮儀 08
      • 本週-敬拜禮儀 09
      • 本週-敬拜禮儀 10
      • 敬拜神學入門 Public Worship 101
      • 敬拜詩篇 Psalms for Worship
      • 敬拜之規範性原則 Regulative Principle of Worship
      • 聖約敬拜規範原則與命令
      • 讀唱詩篇 Exclusive Psalmody
      • 西敏斯特大會與獨頌詩篇 Westminster Assembly and Exclusive Psalmody
      • 改革宗教會的詩篇頌唱歷史 John Calvin and the Psalmody of the Reformed Church
      • 英文詩歌在敬拜中的演變 The English Hymn: Its Development and Use in Worship
      • 西敏斯特會議與講道的改革
    • 聖餐禮儀 Lord's Supper
    • 領聖餐會員盟約
    • 成人洗禮 Baptism of an Adult
  • ASRPCI 部落格 Blog
  • 1/2019 每日讀經靈修
  • 12/2018 每日讀經靈修
    • 11/2018 每日讀經靈修 >
      • 10/2018 每日讀經靈修
      • 9/2018 每日讀經靈修 >
        • 8/2018 每日讀經靈修
        • 7/2018 每日讀經靈修
  • 【啟示錄 查經】 導論 01-03
    • 啟示錄 導論 04-06
    • 啟示錄 1章 07 天上異象
    • 啟示錄 2-3章 08 七個教會
    • 啟示錄 4-5章 09 神的寶座
    • 啟示錄 6-7章 10 七印
    • 啟示錄 8-11章 11 七號
    • 啟示錄 12-14章 12 七段歷史
    • 啟示錄 15-16章 13 七碗
    • 啟示錄 17-19 章 14 巴比倫
    • 啟示錄 19 章 15 騎白馬的審判
    • 啟示錄 20-21章 16 最後的審判
    • 啟示錄 21-22章 17 新耶路撒冷
    • 啟示錄 22章 18 結尾與勸勉
  • 查經 Bible Study-羅馬書
  • 查經 Bible Study— 加拉太書
  • 最近活動 Latest Events
  • 社區服事 Community Outreach
  • 領聖餐會員盟約 Covenant of Communicant Membership
  • 神聖盟約 Sacred Bond
  • 聖經重要議題
    • 01-神國度的起源
    • 02-神國度的建造與發展
    • 03-普遍恩典之約
    • 04- 亞伯拉罕之約
    • 05- 摩西之約
    • 06- 會幕
  • 改革宗神學 必讀書目
  • 改革宗長老會治會章程RPCNA Constitution
  • 聖經圖表
  • 聖潔-Holiness 萊爾 J.C .Ryle
  • 神的國度 聖經專題講座
  • 準備釋經講道 Danny Prutow
  • 準備釋經講道-Steven Lawson
  • 準備釋經講道-John MacArthur
  • 釋經講道講座-Rev.Sawtelle
    • 1-理論與講道
    • 2-德行與講道
    • 3-神學與講道
    • 4-經文分析與講道
    • 5-應用與講道
    • 6-修辭與講道
    • 7-預備與講道
    • 8-禱告與講道
  • Youtube 視頻操作
  • 聖經的教會論

爾灣聖徒改革宗長老會
All Saints Reformed presbyterian Church Irvine, California




《現代神學精髓》的爭論-學習什麼是「白白的恩典」

轉載自:http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/onsite/MarrowControversy.html


The Marrow Controversy—Lessons in Free Grace

 

History

1717 and 1722:   Controversy in the Church of Scotland (reformed & Presbyterian church)

1717 Presbytery of Auchterarder—William Craig ordination trials. 

He would not affirm this statement, known as the Auchterarder Creed: 

“It is not sound and orthodox to teach that we must forsake sin

  in order to our coming to Christ.”

The creed was later condemned by the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland as “unsound and detestable doctrine.”

This exposed a division within the Church of Scotland between groups who came to be known as the “Marrow Men” and the “Neonomians.”

Marrow Men

Group of 12 objected to the condemnation of the creed by the Assembly.  Included Thomas Boston, Ralph Erskine & Ebeneezer Erskine.  Boston said the creed was a bit poorly worded, but true.  He didn’t say anything about it on the floor of Presbytery, though.

Neonomians

The majority of the Presbytery who held that the gospel is a "new law" (neonomos), replacing the OT law with the legal conditions of faith and repentance needing to be met before salvation can be offered. They maintained the necessity of forsaking sin before Christ can be received, whereas the Marrow Men replied that only union to Christ can give us power to forsake sin. The Neonomians considered the Marrow men’s view of the preaching of free grace to be dangerously antinomian.

In 1718 James Hog reprinted The Marrow of Modern Divinity by Edward Fisher (1645).  The short book articulated the same view of free grace that Boston and the Erskines were preaching.  In 1720 the General Assembly prohibited recommending the book or advocating it, and said ministers must warn against its use.  In 1721 Thomas Boston wrote published an annotated version of Marrow .  The Marrow men were formally rebuked by the church's General Assembly in 1722 but not removed from their ministries.

 

 

 


The Issues of the Controversy:

1.  Must a person forsake his sins in order to come to Christ?

Auchterarder Creed:  “It is not sound and orthodox to teach that we must forsake sin

    in order to our coming to Christ.”

Thomas Boston: 

q       That it is the duty of all those that hear the gospel to instantly believe in Him without looking for any qualification from within.

q       That it is impossible for any to forsake their sins until the Spirit had determined him to come to Christ as a Prince and Savior exalted to give repentance and remission of sins.

Are faith & repentance meritorious good works?

                        Repentance as the magic good work for the neonomians

                        Faith as the magic good work in modern Lordship controversies

Over the years in Scotland, the reformed understanding of how someone becomes a Christian (the ordo salutis) in terms of personal experience (not doctrinally) had changed.  The Marrow men said grace always preceeds faith and repentance.  

Repentance is not a condition of the gospel offer nor a condition of salvation, strictly speaking.  Repentance is never a cause of grace or a condition of grace but always a consequence of grace.

The Neonomians were insinuating that someone’s penitence would merit God’s grace and forgiveness.  The Marrow men called this bondage and legalism.  For instance, in the parable of the prodigal son, the son was returning home wondering in his heart, have I repented enough, felt sorrow enough that the father might accept me?  In the father’s embrace any talk of conditions for the unconditional love he has for his son is silenced.  But, the older brother said, “Have I not met all of the conditions?  Haven’t I  merited such a feast?”  The father says, “It is yours unconditionally, but your legal heart will never set you free to enjoy it.  On those conditions you can never have it.”  There is always the danger that the spirit of the elder brother, of the legalist, will invade the preaching and application of the gospel.  (See the Legal Spirit section under #3.)

Let all that love to wear the gospel-dress,

Know that as sin, so dastard righteousness

Has slain its thousands, who in tow'ring pride

The righteousness of Jesus Christ deride;

A robe divinely wrought, divinely won,

Yet cast by men for rags that are their own.

But some to legal works seem whole deny'd,

Yet would by gospel-works be justify'd,

By faith, repentance, love, and other such:

These dreamers being righteous overmuch,

Like Uzza give the ark a wrongful touch.

By legal deeds, however gospeliz'd,

Can e'er tremendous justice be appeas'd?

Or sinners justify'd before that God,

Whose law is perfect and exceeding broad?

Nay, faith itself, that leading gospel-grace,

Holds, as a work, no justifying place.   (Ralph & Ebeneezer Erskine)

2. Is the Gospel to be offered to all or only to those who show signs of being elect?

Question of the Free Offer of the Gospel

Thomas Boston:

q       That there is no universal atonement yet there is warrant to offer Christ to all mankind whether elect or reprobate and a warrant for all to freely receive Christ however great sinners they are or have been.

The offer bears the sufficiency of the sacrifice of Christ for all.  This does not imply a universal atonement or redemption.  The marrow men also  stood for the confessional standards.  Yet they believed that the offer of the gospel is to be published to all men everywhere.

           

The neonomians were orthodox Calvinists, but theirs was a reformed orthodoxy that was thoroughly lifeless and cold and dead.  Boston saw while he agreed with the neonomians in preaching a doctrine of unconditional election, they were also preaching a doctrine of conditional and conditioned grace, and there work was therefore tearing the feet from under the fullness and freeness of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Basic Neonomian teaching:

The grace of God in Christ saves the elect

The elect are known by the forsaking of sin

Grace is therefore given to those who forsake sin

The neonomians preached a conditional offer of the gospel. If you have sufficiently repented you may receive grace.  But, only the grace of Jesus enables us to forsake sin. That repentance can’t be the condition of hearing the gospel.  When we make the offer dependent upon conditions we disgrace the gospel.

The vital distinction is between conviction as a means that God employs and conviction as a condition that we fulfill.  Conviction of sin is never a condition for the free offer of the gospel.

Hence Neonomians spring, as sundry call
The new law-makers, to redress our fall.
The law of works into repentance, faith,
Is chang'd, as their Baxterian Bible saith.
Shaping the gospel to an easy law,
They build their tott'ring house with hay and straw;
Yet hide, like Rachel's idols in the stuff,
Their legal hands within a gospel-muff.

Nor make the law a squaring rule of life,
But in the gospel-throat a bloody knife.                         (Erskines’ Sonnet)

A story about Pilgrim’s Progress.   . 

John Newton:  “If you tarry ‘til you’re better, you will never come at all.”


3. How can orthodox Christians wind up with a legal spirit?

Neonomians called the marrow men antinomian. 

Marrow men said the neonomians were legalistic.

Legal Spirit

We encounter not only doctrinal legalism but also, often along with it, an experimental legalism.  Possible to have an evangelical head and a legal heart. 

Neonomians had mastered the pattern by which grace works.  Knew the ordo salutis and Westminster Confession inside out.  Yet knowing the pattern by which grace works, they had never been mastered by the grace of God in the gospel in their hearts.  They were Calvinists with the minds and hearts of natural men as far as these truths were concerned.  They were masters of Calvinism who had never been mastered by God’s grace.

But the Auchterarder smoked out the heart of legalism in these orthodox men.  The marrow controversy was a litmus paper for legalism.

They failed to distinguish between the law as a covenant of works and the law as a rule of life.  But Boston said: “There is a wide difference between the law as a rule of life and a covenant of works. That as a rule of life God can have no vindictive or legal anger at them for their sins but a Fatherly anger and displeasure over their sins. Therefore Christians ought to mourn as those who have sinned against a reconciled Father.

Attitudes of Legal Spirit

            Attitude towards the lost:

Sinclair Ferguson:Until grace and God himself masters a man, that grace will never flow out to other people.  He will become Jonah under his tree with a heart shut up against sinners in need of grace because he thinks of God in conditional terms.  The hearts of the neonomians had been shut to the lost. 

E.g., parable of the elder brother.  Legalism shows itself in the light of the exposure of free grace.  The gospel produces in us a gracious heart pursuing the prodigal, loving the sinner. 

            Attitude towards other Christians:

E.g., parable of the laborers in vineyard 11th hour.  Murmuring against their fellows.  Sign of self-righteous temper with legality at its roots. 

o       Mentality that speaks of us and them. 

o       Zeal for church discipline, disguised as zeal for justice and truth but is an unwillingness to welcome those whom Christ welcomes, temper of a heart never delivered and mastered by God’s free grace.


Attitude towards sinners:

Alexander White:  There is such a thing as sanctification by vinegar.  It makes a man accurate and hard.  When people come being tempted by sin, broken by it, ashamed to confess the mess they made, it is not a Calvinistic pastor who has been sanctified by vinegar they need, but a pastor who has been mastered by the unconditional grace of God, and from whom iron clad orthodoxy has been torn away and the whole armor of a gracious God has been applied; the armor of him who would not break the bruised reed or quench the dimly burning wick. 

 

Attitudes toward God

John Owen: 

“Unacquaintedness with our mercies & our privileges is our sin as well as our trouble.  We harken not to the voice of the Spirit which is given unto us that we may know the things that are freely bestowed on us of God.   This makes us go heavily when we might rejoice.  And to be weak where we might be strong in the Lord. How few of the saints are experimentally acquainted with this privilege of holding immediate communion with the Father in love?  With what anxious doubtful thoughts do they look upon him? What fears what questionings are there of his goodwill and kindness?  At the best many think there is no sweetness at all in God towards us, but what is purchased at the high price of the blood of Jesus.  It is true that that alone is the way of communication, but the free fountain and spring of all is in the bosom of the Father.”

Attitudes in the face of temptation & accusation:

Satan uses the law to twist our minds in rebellion against God.  He drives us back to the law as a works covenant.  He confirms our worst legal fears.  He distorts what we once knew of the free grace of God in the gospel.  All Christians know the accusers voice, “you are not good enough to be a believer, far less a pastor.” Our refuge is our confession that nothing good dwells in us and we fly to Jesus. 

John Newton:  “Bowed down beneath a load of sin, by Satan sorely pressed. By war without, and fears within, I come to thee for rest. Be thou my shield and hiding-place; That, sheltered near thy side, I may my fierce accuser face, And tell him, thou hast died!”

與我們保持聯繫 connect

用 email 與我們聯絡

irvinerpc@gmail.com

與我們聯絡 contact

Submit
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

我們的資訊 Info

爾灣聖徒改革宗長老會
All Saints Reformed Presbyterian Church Irvine
www.asrpci.org
The Groves Community Clubhouse
5200 Irvine Blvd, Irvine, CA 92620
​
(between Yale and Jeffrey Rd.)
主日午   敬拜         09:30-11:00 
             主日學     11:15-12:00

 造訪者請電:626-329-3788 ​
​    與牧師聯絡:949-751-7816   
Picture
Picture